Misinformation & Interior Design Regulation
This report responds to a purported rebuttal of the Institute for Justice’s research on interior design regulations and details how its author, an advocate of increased regulation, fails to provide any evidence of the need for or benefits from limiting entry to the trade. The rebuttal is not only laced with logical and factual errors, but it also concedes a key finding from IJ’s research: Efforts to regulate interior design come exclusively from powerful industry insiders.
Related Cases
4th Amendment Project | Cosmetology
Test Case Rima
The Case [case introduction text goes here] Watch the story Optional Video Promo Optional description of the video can be…
Economic Liberty | Education Entrepreneurship
Education Entrepreneur Fights for Her Innovative Hybrid School
Katy Duckstein runs a hybrid homeschool program in Pennsylvania, but the state wants to bury her in red tape.
Cosmetology | Economic Liberty
South Carolina Mobile Beauty
The Case Brandi Rosemond wants to run a mobile beauty salon. And she’s done everything you’d expect to get her business off the ground. She went to beauty school and learned…