Designed to Mislead
Do people who design interiors “mislead” the public when they call themselves “interior designers” without government permission? Industry insiders advocating greater regulation say yes, but practicing interior designers who simply want to accurately describe what they do say no. This report tests each side’s claims.
Using an opinion poll and a survey of leading industry magazines, we sought to find out what the public and industry sources really think when they hear the title “interior designer.” Results demonstrate that, in fact, no one is misled by people who do the actual work of designers calling themselves “interior designers,” even if they lack certain qualifications.
This squares with the experience of actual design entrepreneurs who report that their customers care about their style and their work, not the degree they hold or a test they passed. Results also suggest that imposing qualifications by law that lack any basis in evidence is what misleads the public—not designers who honestly describe what they do.
Related Cases
4th Amendment Project | Cosmetology
Test Case Rima
The Case [case introduction text goes here] Watch the story Optional Video Promo Optional description of the video can be…
Economic Liberty | Education Entrepreneurship
Education Entrepreneur Fights for Her Innovative Hybrid School
Katy Duckstein runs a hybrid homeschool program in Pennsylvania, but the state wants to bury her in red tape.
Cosmetology | Economic Liberty
South Carolina Mobile Beauty
The Case Brandi Rosemond wants to run a mobile beauty salon. And she’s done everything you’d expect to get her business off the ground. She went to beauty school and learned…
In The News
Liberty & Law Article
Exposing the CT and OK Interior Design Cartel
Liberty & Law Article