Busted! Wilmington Agrees To Overhaul Its Predatory Impound Scheme Busted!
Ordinarily, when a city contracts government services to private companies, it pays them. But the city of Wilmington, Delaware, thought it came up with a clever way to avoid paying tow companies for their services: Rather than offer money, why not let the companies keep the cars they seize? Then, by devising a predatory impound scheme that ensures people can’t get their cars back, the city could get all the towing services it needed—without paying a penny!
In 2021, Ameera Shaheed and Earl Dickerson—Wilmington residents who lost their cars to this “government theft auto” racket—partnered with IJ to end it. After four years of litigation, the city backed down. It agreed to compensate Ameera and Earl and reform its impound procedures.
Here’s how the scheme operated. A private towing company would offer its services to the city at zero cost. In exchange, the company could tow any legally parked car with at least $200 in unpaid parking fines without any advance notice or hearing. From there, a car owner had just 30 days to pay every penny of the parking tickets, towing fees, storage fees, and other fines. There was no opportunity for a hearing before this ransom payment. If the owner failed to come up with the money, the towing company kept the car. Worst of all, the owner still owed the parking ticket debt—meaning her next car could be impounded, too.
After IJ scored a preliminary win in trial court, the city finally agreed to work with us to overhaul its impoundment practices in line with the U.S. Constitution—including multiple violation notices, accessible payment plans, and expedited hearings. And most importantly, if a car is ultimately scrapped or sold, the owner’s remaining tickets and fees are dismissed. Once predatory, Wilmington’s impound system now serves as a model for cities nationwide.
Similar IJ cases continue in Chicago, Detroit, and Brookside, Alabama. Though the details of each city’s scheme may vary, each case advances the same principle we vindicated in Wilmington: Government (and its private contractors) cannot take property without a good reason and without procedural protections demanded by the Constitution.
Will Aronin is an IJ senior attorney.
Also in this Issue
Liberty & Law
IJ Win Closes Civil Forfeiture Loophole In Nevada
Liberty & Law
Property Owner Hit With $7 Million Fine Will Have Her Day In Court
Liberty & Law
Victory: IJ Client Accused Of “Unfair Competition” Now Free To Open Shop
Liberty & Law
New IJ Research Makes Case For A Clean Cut From Licensing
Liberty & Law
Building On Sylvia Gonzalez’s Historic Supreme Court Win
Liberty & Law
Government Asserts: All Your Cash Belongs To Us
Liberty & Law
Viva Pat Caswell (1941–2025)
Liberty & Law
IJ Makes Headlines
Liberty & Law
GRANTED! Supreme Court Will Hear FBI Wrong-House Raid Case
Subscribe to get Liberty & Law magazine direct to your mailbox!
Sign up to receive IJ's bimonthly magazine, Liberty & Law, along with breaking news updates about the Institute for Justice's fight to protect the rights of all Americans.