Jon McGlothian of Virginia Beach, Virginia, is an Army veteran and an all-star project management instructor. His wife, Tracy, owns a successful sewing business and wants to teach her skills to others. But Jon and Tracy’s entrepreneurial dreams became a bureaucratic nightmare when they encountered the State Council of Higher Education for Virginia (SCHEV).
As it turns out, in Virginia you can teach anyone anything—except how to earn an honest living. That’s because it’s illegal to teach job skills to Virginians without SCHEV’s approval.
Getting permission to teach isn’t cheap or easy. Just applying costs $2,500. Worse, SCHEV won’t license any school until it has inspected the school’s facilities, meaning that applicants must lease teaching space before they even know whether they will be approved to operate.
And the burdens aren’t merely financial—schools must also convince SCHEV their speech is worth allowing. This requires explaining how their courses are of the “quality, content, and length” necessary to achieve their “stated objective,” submitting evaluations of courses’ effectiveness, and proving to SCHEV that their instructors are qualified.
Jon and Tracy tried to meet these requirements. They spent thousands of dollars and dozens of hours putting together a heavy binder to prove their fitness to teach, but they were repeatedly rejected and asked to provide more information.
Fed up with these delays, Jon and Tracy are fighting back. The government couldn’t regulate Jon and Tracy if they wrote books about project management or sewing—and under the First Amendment, their in-person instruction should enjoy the same protection. That’s why Jon and Tracy joined with IJ this summer to challenge the constitutionality of Virginia’s vocational school requirements in federal court.
This is the second time IJ has challenged Virginia’s requirements for vocational schools. In 2009, IJ sued on behalf of schools that train yoga instructors. But the Virginia General Assembly amended the law to exclude schools that teach people to earn a living by teaching hobbies like yoga. That was a victory for our clients, but it didn’t protect the majority of vocational schools.
Now we’re ready to finish what we started nearly a decade ago. Teaching is speech and, under the First Amendment, decisions about what to teach and from whom to learn are left to teachers and students—not government bureaucrats. If SCHEV can’t see that, we’ll be happy to teach it a lesson.
Related Cases
Economic Liberty | First Amendment | Occupational Speech
Virginia Teaching
Jon and Tracy McGlothian wanted to teach job skills to adults in Virginia, but the state told them they could not do so without a license. With IJ’s help, Jon and Tracy were able to…
Economic Liberty | First Amendment | Health | Occupational Licensing | Occupational Speech
Texas Veterinary Speech II
Ron Hines is a veterinarian who offers advice online to customers all over the country, but Texas said his speech was illegal. Now his case can move ahead on First Amendment grounds.
Economic Liberty | First Amendment | Occupational Licensing | Occupational Speech
Mississippi Mapping
An overly-broad statute defined a small mapping company in Mississippi as an “unlicensed surveying” company. This statute would have shut down Vizaline, but with help from IJ, Vizaline fought back to protect its First Amendment…
Economic Liberty | First Amendment | Occupational Speech
California Trade Schools
California used to require individuals to get a high school degree or equivalent if they wanted to enroll in a trade school, like Bob Smith’s horseshoeing school. After IJ stepped in on Bob’s behalf, the…
Subscribe to get Liberty & Law magazine direct to your mailbox!
Sign up to receive IJ's bimonthly magazine, Liberty & Law, along with breaking news updates about the Institute for Justice's fight to protect the rights of all Americans.